Behaviour

Collaborative and Proactive Solutions: a parent's guide to CPS for neurodivergent children

A practical parent guide to Ross Greene's CPS model. What it is, how Plan B works, and how to adapt it for autistic, PDA, and ADHD children.

Collaborative and Proactive Solutions, developed by Dr Ross Greene, starts from one idea: your child isn't behaving badly because they won't do better. They're struggling because they can't do better, right now, with the skills they currently have. CPS gives you a structure for getting there, and it's the approach most frequently recommended by the PDA Society and increasingly by clinicians working with autistic children, children with ADHD, and children whose behaviour has been labelled "challenging."

What is collaborative and proactive solutions?

CPS rests on two principles. First: challenging behaviour happens when demands outstrip the skills a child has to respond. Second: the best way to reduce that behaviour is to solve the problems causing it, collaboratively with the child, before the next crisis.

Greene puts it bluntly: "There is zero research telling us that kids respond poorly to problems and frustrations because they're poorly motivated. That study doesn't exist. There's a mountain of research telling us that they're lacking skills."

For parents of neurodivergent children, this reframes everything. Your child is stuck; the behaviours you're seeing are what "stuck" looks like when a child lacks the flexibility, frustration tolerance, or problem-solving skills to handle what's being asked of them.

The three plans: how collaborative and proactive solutions organises every expectation

CPS sorts every adult response to an unmet expectation into one of three categories.

Plan A is imposing your will: insist the child complies, back it up with consequences. Greene reserves this strictly for genuine, immediate safety emergencies. He's clear that Plan A "increases the likelihood of challenging episodes" and doesn't solve problems durably.

Plan B is the heart of CPS: structured problem-solving between you and your child, working together to understand what's making something hard and find a solution that works for both of you.

Plan C is deliberately dropping or deferring an expectation: a strategic choice. Greene recommends working on no more than three unsolved problems at a time; everything else goes to Plan C.

For autistic children, children with ADHD, and children with a PDA profile, Plan C is often where the biggest immediate relief comes from. Reducing the expectation load isn't giving in; it's creating the breathing room your child needs to actually engage with the problems that matter most.

How Plan B actually works: the three steps

Plan B follows three steps, always in this order. Rushing or reordering them is the single most common mistake parents make.

Step 1: The Empathy Step. You're gathering information about your child's concern: genuinely curious about what's making this hard for them.

The opening follows a consistent formula: "I've noticed that [specific problem]. What's up?" When your child responds, dig deeper:

  • Reflective listening: "Can you say more about that?" / "How so?" / "What do you mean?"
  • Asking about specifics: "What part of the homework is hardest?"
  • Asking about what varies: "You seem fine with reading homework but not maths. What's different about maths?"
  • Breaking it into parts: "So writing is hard. Is thinking of the answer the hard part? Or is remembering it long enough to write it down?"
  • Hypothesis testing (critical for children who struggle to articulate): "I'm wondering if the reason it's hard to eat dinner at the table is because the chair is uncomfortable. Am I right about that?"

Do not leave this step until you genuinely understand your child's concern.

Step 2: Define Adult Concerns. Enter your concern briefly: "The thing is..." or "My concern is..." One or two sentences. Then stop.

Step 3: The Invitation. Collaborate on a solution that addresses both sets of concerns. "I wonder if there's a way to [child's concern] and also [adult's concern]?"

The solution must be doable by both of you and must address both concerns. Every agreement ends with: "Let's try this and check back in a few days to see if it's working."

Greene is emphatic: "Don't enter this step with preordained solutions." If you already know what answer you want, you're doing disguised Plan A.

Proactive Plan B versus emergency Plan B

Proactive Plan B happens during a calm moment, after you've already identified the problem. Most unsolved problems are predictable; the conversation can and should happen before the next crisis.

Emergency Plan B uses the same steps mid-crisis. Greene describes it as less likely to work than Proactive Plan B, but far more likely to work than Plan A. If most of your problem-solving is happening in crisis, that's itself a sign something needs to shift; conversations associated with distress become harder over time.

The ALSUP: figuring out what's actually going on

The Assessment of Lagging Skills and Unsolved Problems (ALSUP) is a free discussion guide at livesinthebalance.org: a structured way to identify which skills your child is still developing and which predictable problems those gaps produce.

The ALSUP lists 18 lagging skills, including:

  • Difficulty handling transitions
  • Difficulty managing emotional response to frustration
  • Concrete, literal, black-and-white thinking
  • Difficulty handling unpredictability, ambiguity, or novelty
  • Difficulty attending to or interpreting social cues
  • Difficulty shifting from an original plan
  • Sensory/motor difficulties

If you're the parent of an autistic child and thinking "that's half of them," you're not wrong. Several ALSUP lagging skills map directly onto common autistic profiles, which is why CPS resonates so strongly with neurodivergent families.

For each lagging skill, list the specific unsolved problems connected to it: free of judgement ("difficulty completing the word problems on the maths homework," not "screams and swears during homework"), specific (who, what, where, when), and split into individual problems. Prioritise. The top one to three become Plan B priorities; everything else goes to Plan C.

What does the evidence say about collaborative and proactive solutions?

Three clinical trials compared CPS with Parent Management Training (the gold standard for oppositional behaviour). All three found CPS matched it, and one also improved the parent-child relationship. In psychiatric inpatient settings, restraint events at Yale-New Haven Children's Hospital dropped from 263 per year to 7 after CPS implementation.

Honesty matters: nobody has yet run a proper trial of CPS specifically with autistic children. The underlying logic is confirmed (autistic children with weaker executive function and emotion regulation do show more challenging behaviour, which is exactly the skills-gap model CPS is built on), but the autism-specific trial hasn't been published.

CPS is widely recommended for autistic children by the PDA Society, clinicians, and parent communities, based on how well the approach fits and on clinical experience. NICE guidelines do not currently reference CPS, so you're unlikely to encounter it through CAMHS or NHS pathways.

How to adapt collaborative and proactive solutions for autistic children

  • Use declarative language rather than open-ended questions. "I noticed brushing teeth is really tricky for you" works better than "Why won't you brush your teeth?"
  • Allow significantly more processing time. Silence is processing. Get comfortable with long pauses.
  • Break problems into component parts more often. "Getting ready has lots of parts. Is getting out of bed the hard part? Or is choosing clothes the hard part?"
  • Use hypothesis testing. Many autistic children struggle to name what they're feeling: "I'm wondering if the noise in the corridor is too much. Am I right?"
  • Explore sensory drivers specifically. Unsolved problems may be driven by sensory factors the adult hasn't considered.
  • Use Plan C aggressively. Autistic children often face an overwhelming number of expectations that don't match their neurological profile.

Greene on verbal ability: "Yes, we do this with kids who are nonspeaking. Yes, we do this with kids who haven't talked to a caregiver for eight years." For children with limited verbal communication, use observation, hypothesis testing, and drawn or written communication. For younger children, Pivotal Response Treatment applies similar principles to building verbal communication.

CPS and PDA: why it works, and where to be careful

CPS treats the child as an equal partner, reduces the demand load through Plan C, and prioritises understanding over compliance; the PDA Society describes it as "a helpful way to support PDAers." Plan B itself can feel like a demand for a child with a PDA profile, though, and demands trigger anxiety in PDA.

What you can do:

  • Use Plan C far more aggressively than you might with a non-PDA child
  • Frame Plan B as curiosity: "I was just curious about something..." rather than "We need to solve this problem"
  • Always use Proactive Plan B; Emergency Plan B introduces a surprise demand, which many PDA children find most threatening
  • Offer specific options in the Invitation Step: "I wonder if we could try [option A] or [option B]?" rather than "What should we do?"
  • Work on one unsolved problem at a time, gradually, over days or weeks

CPS and ADHD: what to adjust

Children with ADHD bring specific challenges: working memory limitations, impulsivity, and emotional dysregulation can all derail the structured steps.

  • Keep conversations shorter; break the three steps across multiple brief sessions if needed
  • Write down or visually represent concerns as they emerge, so working memory isn't overtaxed
  • Summarise frequently during the Empathy Step
  • Choose timing carefully (when medication is active if applicable, when distractions are minimal)
  • Check in more frequently on whether agreed solutions are working

CPS addresses the oppositional overlay that commonly accompanies ADHD, but core hyperactivity and impulsivity may need separate support. CPS solves the collaboration problem; it doesn't change the "can't sit still" part.

How CPS compares with low demand parenting

CPS and low demand parenting are highly complementary. CPS's Plan C is essentially what low demand parenting does as its primary strategy; CPS then uses Plan B to actively solve the remaining priority problems. Many families use both: low demand provides the baseline environment, CPS provides the structured tool for tackling specific unsolved problems when the child is regulated enough to engage.

The nine most common CPS mistakes parents make

  1. Rushing or skipping the Empathy Step. Treating empathy as a formality before delivering your solution. Universally cited as the number one error.
  2. Leading the solution. Entering the Invitation Step with a preordained answer. Children detect this instantly.
  3. Trying to solve too many problems at once. Complete the ALSUP first. Prioritise ruthlessly. Use Plan C for everything else.
  4. Over-relying on Emergency Plan B. When CPS only happens in crisis, the steps become associated with distress.
  5. Reverting to Plan A mid-conversation. If the child is escalating, pause: "Let's take a break and come back to this." That's strategic Plan C.
  6. Framing unsolved problems with judgement. "I've noticed you're having difficulty sharing the TV with your brother after school" works. "I've noticed you've been terrorising your brother" doesn't.
  7. Expecting immediate results. CPS practitioners report two to four weeks for initial improvements, two to three months for significant changes in explosive episodes, and potentially years for full relationship repair where trust has been deeply eroded.
  8. Sermonising during the Define Adult Concerns step. One or two sentences. Then move on.
  9. Using Plan B as manipulation. If your empathy is a performance rather than genuine curiosity, your child will disengage.

When your child won't engage with Plan B

If your child says "I don't know," check: was the unsolved problem worded neutrally? Was it specific enough? Are you using Proactive rather than Emergency Plan B? Does the child need the problem broken into parts, or more time to think?

If your child shuts down or walks away, don't chase or force. Note the topic and return proactively at a calmer time. Greene's advice: sometimes you need a conversation about what makes talking hard before you can talk about anything else.

If your child escalates during Plan B, stop. A nervous system in meltdown cannot learn, reason, or cooperate. De-escalate. Return to the problem later using Proactive Plan B.

When co-parents or family members disagree about CPS

Greene's advice: use Plan B on your partner. Empathise with their concern ("I hear that you're worried this is too permissive"), define yours ("My concern is that what we've been doing isn't working"), and invite collaboration ("I wonder if we could try this for a month and see what happens").

Start from shared frustration: most reluctant partners agree the current approaches aren't producing results. Share resources gradually (a short video, not an entire book). Even one parent using CPS can produce meaningful change. For extended family, focus on the fundamental reframe ("kids do well if they can") rather than technical details.

How to introduce collaborative and proactive solutions to your child's school

Greene wrote Lost at School specifically for this.

  • Share the ALSUP with the school team as a neutral starting document. It helps teachers identify lagging skills and unsolved problems without requiring them to adopt the full model.
  • Direct teachers to the free Lives in the Balance Educators Tour at livesinthebalance.org.
  • In EHCP annual reviews, request CPS-informed strategies in Section F. The PDA Society recommends this wording: "Use Dr Ross Greene's Collaborative & Proactive Solutions model to identify lagging skills and solve problems together once they are calm."

Teachers commonly object that they can't do this with 30 children. Greene's response: you don't need to. Start with the children who are repeatedly disruptive or referred. Identify no more than three priority unsolved problems per child and conduct brief Proactive Plan B conversations at a mutually agreed time.

Where to find CPS resources in the UK

UK-based CPS practitioners are scarce but exist. Sasha Bemrose of Connected Parenting UK (connectedparenting.co.uk), based in Devon, is an Advanced Practitioner in CPS. At least one HCPC-registered educational psychologist in London is listed on the CPS Connection directory. All formal CPS training goes through Lives in the Balance's virtual programmes.

What you can do right now:

  • Download the free ALSUP from livesinthebalance.org
  • Map your child's lagging skills and unsolved problems
  • Place all but three problems on Plan C
  • Begin practising the Empathy Step with those three
  • Read The Explosive Child (Ross Greene) for the full framework, or Lost at School if school is the primary battleground

Greene: "This Plan B stuff is hard." It is. But solving problems collaboratively is consistently more durable than imposing solutions unilaterally, and it treats your child as the capable person they are.